More than a third of protected areas in Asia may lose tigers

April 4, 2018 Asia , News , OPINION/NEWS

pixabay photo

 

By

Jose Kalathil

 

 

The population of tigers around the world has fast been declining. Today, they number only 3,900. If the trend continues, tigers will soon become extinct.

 

Concerned over the situation, in 2010, governments of 13 Tiger Range Countries (TRCs) in Asia and South Asia met at St. Petersburg and charted out a declaration, the main point of which being the doubling of tigers’ number by 2022.

 

The 11-point declaration also mentioned increasing the effectiveness of tiger habitat management through the application of modern and innovative science, standards, and technologies, regular monitoring of tigers, their prey and habitat, adaptive management practices and building capacity of institutions involved in science and training, creating also a platform for interactive knowledge exchange at all levels.

 

So, in 2013, at the Asia Parks Congress in Japan, the Conversation Assured Tiger Standards (CA/TS), a partnership between governments, NGOs and tiger conservation areas, was launched to define and implement these standards. Hosted by WWF and based presently at WWF Singapore, CA/TS provides member countries, individual tiger conservation areas or networks of areas with the opportunity to demonstrate commitment to, and success in, protecting wild tigers. It also ensures that wild tigers have space to live and breed safe from threats resulting in increased populations and the recovery of range.

 

It also conducted the first and largest rapid assessment of site-based tiger conservation across Asia, which said only 13 percent of the tiger conservation areas in the region met the global standards. The survey also revealed the current management methodologies in 112 sites located in 11 tiger range countries, including India.

 

The coalition was in response to the need for stringent conservation procedures for protection of the big cat through a partnership between governments and conservation organisations to assess levels of effective management, encourage best standards of management, and to support the TX2 goal to double the number of tigers in the wild, adopted at the St Petersburg Summit.

 

Under the CA/TS accreditation system, tiger conservation areas provide evidence under seven pillars and 17 elements of critical management activity to demonstrate that they meet a range of criteria for effective conservation management. To date, three sites – Lansdowne Forest Division in Uttarakhand, India, Chitwan National Park in Nepal and Sikhote-Alin Nature Reserve in Russia – have been awarded CA/TS Approved status.

 

The survey covered approximately 70% of the global wild tiger population across over 200,000 km2 of the tiger range.

 

Investment in the effective management of tiger conservation areas has been an important strategy for tiger conservation for many decades. Despite efforts, the sites are far from effective management strategies and tigers have consequently been lost from vast areas of their potential range. Of the 112 global sites surveyed, only 12.5 percent are currently able to meet the full CA/TS criteria. Half of the assessed sites (52.5%) report fairly strong management although there are improvements needed. The remaining 35% (the majority of which are in Southeast Asia) has relatively weak management. Basic needs such as enforcement against poaching, engaging local communities and managing conflict between people and wildlife, remain weak for all areas surveyed.

 

“Ineffective management of tiger conservation areas leads to tiger extinction. To halt and reverse the decline of wild tigers, effective management is thus the single most important action. To achieve this, long-term investment in tiger conservation areas is absolutely essential, and this is a responsibility that must be led by tiger range governments,” said S.P Yadav, Assistant Secretary General, Global Tiger Forum.

 

Positive findings highlight the fact that tiger monitoring is being implemented in 87% of sites. All sites surveyed in the South Asian and East Asian countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan, China, India, Nepal and Russia have management plans; however, several sites in Southeast Asia including countries like Cambodia, Indonesia, Malaysia, Myanmar and Thailand do not. About 85% of sites also have systems for assessing management effectiveness.

 

Despite poaching being one of the greatest threats faced by big cats, 85% of the areas surveyed do not have staff capacity to patrol sites effectively, and 61% of the areas in Southeast Asia have very limited anti-poaching enforcement.

 

Low investment from governments in Southeast Asia was stated as one reason for the lack of management of these supposedly ‘protected areas’. While 86% of areas in South Asia, Russia and China stated that finances are, or are on the way to being sustainable, in comparison only 35% areas in Southeast Asia are in a similar position.

 

“Unless governments commit to sustained investments in the protection of these sites, tiger populations may face the catastrophic decline that they have suffered over the last few decades. This funding is needed urgently, particularly for many sites in Southeast Asia to support recovery of its tiger population,” said Michael Blazer, Chair of the Executive Committee of CA/TS.

 

“To secure a future for wild tigers, functional connectivity between tiger habitats is essential. Through an effective CA/TS framework, robust management plans for the tiger habitats and corridors can be prepared and security protocols can be established. The accreditation of Lansdowne Forest Division, Uttarakhand, in May 2017, the third CA/TS accredited site globally and the first in India, is significant since it is a crucial link between the Rajaji and Corbett Tiger Reserves,” said Ravi Singh, Secretary General and CEO of WWF-India.

 

“The results in this report provides a way for countries to make informed decisions in driving tiger conservation forward, helping to lead a sustainable path for parks, people and tigers to all thrive together,” said Sugoto Roy, Coordinator of the Integrated Tiger Habitat Conservation Programme, IUCN.

 

“The tiger’s survival is a critical indicator for sustainable development in tiger range countries – it is intrinsically linked to the integrity of nature and the services it provides, upon which all development rests,” comments Midori Paxton, Head of Ecosystems and Biodiversity at the UNDP.

 

Jointly released by the CA/TS Partnership, Safe Havens for Wild Tigers: A Rapid Assessment of Management Effectiveness against Conservation Assured Tiger Standards, is the first overview of the management effectiveness of tiger conservation areas across Asia. Based on criteria set by CA/TS, this is the largest survey of site-based tiger management to date, covering over 200,000 km2 in 112 tiger conservation areas that are estimated to hold 70% of the world’s wild tigers.

 

Conservation Assured / Tiger Standards (CA/TS) is an accreditation system designed to measure and improve the management of tiger conservation areas. It is driven by the CA/TS Partnership, which comprises of tiger range governments, intergovernmental agencies, conservation organisations and other institutions, including: Equilibrium Research, Freeland Foundation, Global Wildlife Conservation, Global Tiger Forum, IUCN, Panthera, Smithsonian Institution, United Nations Development Program (UNDP), World Commission on Protected Areas (WCPA), WildTeam, and WWF. The secretariat for CA/TS is hosted by the WWF.

 

 

 

 

Jose_passport

Jose Kalathil

Jose Kalathil is a senior journalist based in New Delhi. With more than three decades of experience in different publications in India and Nepal, he is comfortable writing on any topic under the sun.

Editor review

0 Comments

No Comments Yet!

You can be first to comment this post!

Leave a Reply

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.